Highlights from Khamenei’s Friday Sermon

June 21, 2009 at 11:25 am | Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pakistan: Is Obama Repeating Bush’s Mistakes?

May 7, 2009 at 8:20 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , ,

Is Obama Really Breaking with Bush on Pakistan?

McCain Throws a Tantrum

July 18, 2008 at 12:03 am | Posted in '08 Campaign, Democratic Party, McCain | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

New Yorker Sideswipes Obama

July 14, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Posted in '08 Campaign, Democratic Party | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Is Obama having an unlucky streak of preemptive strikes by low brow news?  It certainly looks like it.  For instance, Obama’s  Op-Ed in the Tiiiiimes shows he wants to plant Afghanistan back in the media spotlight, and strategically speaking, put McCain on the defensive, forcing him to talk about the country and the resurgance of the Taliban, a subject he talks about far less than Iraq.  But to Obama’s chagrin, all the media will bloviate about today will be the New Yorker cover: Is it smart satire? Is it in poor taste? How many people think Obama is a Muslim? Is it all about magazine sales? Is the New Yorker unintentionally (or for the conspiracy theorists INtentionally) sabotaging Obama?  Blah blah blah.  The same thing happened just weeks ago before Obama’s highly touted speech on patriotism, an issue Obama needs sealed up before heading into the final stretch.  Instead of the media analyzing the craftmanship of the speech, comparisons to his famous speech on race, asking if it erased character doubts, the day was spent drolling on about Ret. General Wesley Clark’s comments on Face the Nation.  Is this normal or is happening to Obama more often than the average pol?

WWOD?

July 10, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Posted in '08 Campaign, Democratic Party | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Is it me or do you see a pattern developing from Obama…what I refer to as the “duck and deflect” manueuver anytime he has to answer a question on foreign policy?  Yesterday, Matt Lauer asked Obama this:

Lauer: State run media in Iran went out of its way to say missiles could reach Israel and US mil sites. What would your msg to Israel be both publicly and privately?

Obama: Well as you heard from your own commentator they have had this kind of long range capability for some time and I think it’s part of the reason why we’ve got to proceed agressively with the kinds of diplomacy in the region as a whole. Part of the problem we’ve got right now is that we’ve been basically farming out diplomatically activity to the Europeans. We’ve got to be actively engaged I’ve called for example here in the United States the application of potential divestment of Iranian companies. We just found out that during the Bush years U.S. exports to Iran have actually increased, that’s a mistake that sends mixed messages to them.
Whoahoho, economic sanctions?! Unheard of.  Cutting off the cigarette supply?! Fierce.  And what exactly does direct engagement mean? What are the terms of negotiations? What are the carrots? What are the sticks?

If Obama wants to be president, he’s GOT to do better than that.  The way I see it, whenever Obama is asked: what would you DO as PRESIDENT on such and such foreign policy issue, Obama launches into an explanation of what the problem is, how we got there and then blames Bush.  Don’t get me wrong, it’s eloquent, artful and brilliant politics.  But, I see Obama’s fuzzy ideologies on foreign policy becoming a major target for McCain on the trail. 

This interview with the late Tim Russert is evidence of the same pattern:

MR. RUSSERT:  Iraq and Iran, the administration, we have reported at NBC, are drawing up some plans for potential airstrikes in Iran at different missile weapons factories or special force compounds because we have indications, evidence that the Iranians are helping some of their supporters within Iraq to kill U.S. troops.

SEN. OBAMA:  Mm-hmm.

MR. RUSSERT:  If it could be demonstrated that was a fact, would you be in support of such limited attacks in Iran?

SEN. OBAMA:  Well, let, let me not speculate yet.  I want to, I want to take a, take a look at the kind of evidence that the administration is putting forward, what these plans are exactly.  I’ve always said that, you know, as Commander-In-Chief, I don’t take military options off the table and I think it’s appropriate for us to plan for a whole host of contingencies.  But let’s look at the larger picture.  Iran has been the biggest strategic beneficiary of our invasion of Iraq, they are stronger because of our decision to go in; and what we have to do is figure out how are we going to recalibrate our strategic position in the region.  I think that starts with pulling our combat troops out of Iraq.  We have placed them in harm’s way, we have fanned the flames of anti-American sentiment, we are distracted from what’s the real battle front that we need to focus on, which is Afghanistan and, and rooting out al-Qaeda.  And if we put forward a plan where we are not going to be a permanent occupier in Iraq and we force the Iraqis to stand up and negotiate and come to a compromise that includes, by the way, a regional discussion with Iran, with Syria, as well as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey and other regional powers, then I think we are going to be in a better posture to deal with the long-term threat of Iran and particularly its development of nuclear weapons. That’s something that this administration has failed to do.  I have consistently said that we’ve got to talk directly to Iran, send them a clear message that they have to stop, not only with their potential funding of militias inside of Iraq, but they also have to stop funding Hamas, they have to stop funding Hezbollah, they’ve got to stand down on their nuclear weapons. There will be continued consequences for those kinds of actions, but that here are also some carrots and possible benefits if they change behavior.  Those kinds of direct talks have not taken place.  That’s the kind of change in foreign policy that I plan to put in place when I’m president of the United States.

I get it, you know what’s going on, you know the problems in Iraq and you want to get troops out, but with respect to Iran, What Would Obama Do?

OMG The Bases Are Crumbling

July 7, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Posted in '08 Campaign | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

So, it looks like both candidates are having problems at the home base.  The Washington Post features a front page article today on conservative groups ramping up to do battle John McCain’s less than conservative platform before the convention.  The target: global warming, immigration, stem cell research and campaign finance reform. 

Meanwhile, Obama’s netroots base is still unhappy and still blogging.  Stirring up so much ire, that even Obamaniacs, the New York Times editorial page and Frank Rich, took on Obama’s screeching turn to the right last week. 

From Rich:

“For all the hyperventilation on the left about Mr. Obama’s rush to the center — some warranted, some not — what’s more alarming is how small-bore and defensive his campaign has become. Whether he’s reaffirming his long-held belief in faith-based programs or fudging his core convictions about government snooping, he is drifting away from the leadership he promised and into the focus-group-tested calculation patented by Mark Penn in his disastrous campaign for Hillary Clinton. Mr. Obama’s Wednesday address calling for renewed public service is unassailable in principle but inadequate to the daunting size of the serious American crisis at hand. The speech could have been — and has been — delivered by any candidate of either party in any election year since 1960.”

From the NYTimes Editorial Board:

“We are not shocked when a candidate moves to the center for the general election. But Mr. Obama’s shifts are striking because he was the candidate who proposed to change the face of politics, the man of passionate convictions who did not play old political games. There are still vital differences between Mr. Obama and Senator John McCain on issues like the war in Iraq, taxes, health care and Supreme Court nominations. We don’t want any ‘redefining’ on these big questions. This country needs change it can believe in.”

Ouch.  So, now that the media darling’s honeymoon is over, where does Obama go from here?  Well, he gets back on firm foreign policy footing, redefining what and where the real war is and how to fight it. Hint: it rhymes with smishganistan

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.